View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Topic : "Rocks & Mountains" |
DDrake junior member
Member # Joined: 19 Jun 2000 Posts: 12 Location: Segovia, Spain
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 5:33 am |
|
|
Hi all
I�d like to know how can i draw those wonderful textures of mountains, rocks, etc...
I don�t want to use predefines textures o photos, i thinks people like Loki draws it by hand.
I�m very frustrated about that , please help me.
In the example of Loki, i�m refering to the mountais (rocks) he has drawn on his last image.
Thanks in advance |
|
Back to top |
|
Rinaldo member
Member # Joined: 09 Jun 2000 Posts: 1367 Location: Adelaide, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 7:11 am |
|
|
If you take a close look at it. All that's there is a few simple shapes that are the right colour. I imagine Loki would have done a bit of research on what these surfaces look like. There's not that much too it. it's all in the value and shape.
A black background with light grey-blue-green shapes on top. out a bit of black back in to defind cracks and texture etc.
Am I half way there Loki?
[This message has been edited by Rinaldo (edited August 02, 2000).] |
|
Back to top |
|
Tinusch member
Member # Joined: 25 Dec 1999 Posts: 2757 Location: Rhode Island, USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 7:27 am |
|
|
Yeah, I think you are. Loki and Mullins and the rest of those hi-res painters scale down their images greatly. If you were to see it at full size, you'd see all the loose strokes. Take a look at Mullins' previous enter screen, the one with the iMac. The small and large versions were posted not too long ago, but I can't remember where. Anyway, the small version looked almost like a photo, whereas the large version was somewhat sloppy. I assume Loki's images turn out the same way. It all tightens up when you scale down. |
|
Back to top |
|
Rinaldo member
Member # Joined: 09 Jun 2000 Posts: 1367 Location: Adelaide, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 7:31 am |
|
|
Do you mean iMAC or are you mixing it up with the G3.
Because I did the iMAC and spooge did the G3.
|
|
Back to top |
|
Tinusch member
Member # Joined: 25 Dec 1999 Posts: 2757 Location: Rhode Island, USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 7:36 am |
|
|
Err... I don't know... It had a bright bluish-green Apple logo, so I assumed it was an iMac. Do you know where that pic is that I'm referring to? I can't find it... |
|
Back to top |
|
Tinusch member
Member # Joined: 25 Dec 1999 Posts: 2757 Location: Rhode Island, USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 7:38 am |
|
|
...Although, your iMac is just as good an example as Mullins' pic. The large version shows all the loose strokes and whatnot, but the small one looks like a photo. |
|
Back to top |
|
Tinusch member
Member # Joined: 25 Dec 1999 Posts: 2757 Location: Rhode Island, USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 7:41 am |
|
|
...
[This message has been edited by Tinusch (edited August 02, 2000).] |
|
Back to top |
|
Rinaldo member
Member # Joined: 09 Jun 2000 Posts: 1367 Location: Adelaide, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 7:47 am |
|
|
Damn I was hoping you had mistaken me for a spooge. (I'll keep dreaming)
Have you found the pics. the enter screens are on Craig's site but they were talked about recently in a thread called "desktop objects...literaly" or something. I wish people who use high res would show a bigger verison because it's so informative. Just seeing the small ones, it's like howth'fu@#$.
Keep begging and maybe it'll hapen i suppose |
|
Back to top |
|
sh4de member
Member # Joined: 29 Jul 2000 Posts: 124 Location: suomi finland perkele
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 10:12 am |
|
|
yep. it would be really great to see original sized versions of some of those great works.
wouldn't really have to be the whole pic..even just some nice details.
I bet everyone could learn a thing or two. |
|
Back to top |
|
Loki member
Member # Joined: 12 Jan 2000 Posts: 1321 Location: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 10:29 am |
|
|
Here's a detail. It's a crop in original resolution, highest JPEG quality. The image is not as super highres than you think - it was 900x1500, which is quite small IMHO.
I didn't look at any reference when painting the image. I always had a problem painting rocks, so I tried to tackle it here and in some other paintings I did. It's still not quite there.
I basically started out with roughing the whole canyon out, the I put some big details over it and tightened it up.
The far background is too brown - I don't know why I did this. Bad.
The finishing step was placing some light-areas, refining the athmosphere and put a glow over the image, very subtle, but it helps.
[This message has been edited by Loki (edited August 02, 2000).] |
|
Back to top |
|
kathode junior member
Member # Joined: 15 Mar 2000 Posts: 18 Location: Fayetteville, AR, USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 10:52 am |
|
|
Here are those links you guys were talking about:
small
large |
|
Back to top |
|
sh4de member
Member # Joined: 29 Jul 2000 Posts: 124 Location: suomi finland perkele
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2000 11:28 pm |
|
|
thanks loki
btw. I dont think that that brown(ish) color is a bad thing.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|