![](templates/drizz/images/forum_logo_1.gif) |
|
![This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.](templates/drizz/images/lang_english/reply-locked.gif) |
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Topic : "Why people love Dune?" |
Lunatique member
Member # Joined: 27 Jan 2001 Posts: 3303 Location: Lincoln, California
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:11 am |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
I tried watching Chldren of Dune DVD set tonight, and both me and my wife were bored out of our minds. I've seen the David Lynch film before, and it too, was pretty boring. Now, I've never read any of the books, and I don't think I really want to. Having seeing two different takes on Frank Herbert's universe, and having both making me feel only indifference, I wonder if the books will be any different.
What makes me feel indifferent about the Dune universe is that I don't feel any emotions watching the plot unfold. I really couldn't care less who dies, who lives, who's evil, who's noble, and when there are no characters you care about, you won't care about the plot either. All that detail about the various cultures, political factions, character relationships..etc are just that--dry details. It's like reading a history textbook, devoid of emotions and sides you can either cheer for, empathize with, or even hate or dislike.
So tell me, Dune fans, what is it about Dune that you like? Educate me on this because I just don't get it. |
|
Back to top |
|
[Shizo] member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 3938
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:57 am |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
I just liked the game - Dune 2, that's all. |
|
Back to top |
|
StylesDavis member
Member # Joined: 04 Dec 2002 Posts: 259 Location: New-Welver City, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:24 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
i finally finished downloading that movie and wanted to watch it these days- thank you very much lunatique for spoiling my entertainment!!!
honestly, i only loaded it down because of spooges' baronpicures. i wanted to check out his inspiration... _________________ known as "ChrisNix" elsewhere. |
|
Back to top |
|
neff member
Member # Joined: 11 May 2002 Posts: 1444 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:32 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
you did what? you d-d-download that movie? you mean via internet? *hugh*
omg you evil illegal hacker ![Razz](images/smiles/icon_razz.gif) _________________ *
![](http://www.hayungs.de/img/hayungs_schriftzug_small.png) |
|
Back to top |
|
[Shizo] member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 3938
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:33 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
He's not a hacker, he's a cracker! Know your internet lingo, muchacho!!! (j/k)
And i think it's the movie makers that got inspired by Spooge's work, not the other way around .. hehe |
|
Back to top |
|
Capt. Fred member
Member # Joined: 21 Dec 2002 Posts: 1425 Location: South England
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 4:44 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
I liked the first dune book a lot, so I bought the next two in the series, but the second one I never finished. I put it down at some nuclear explosion of some kind, as it just didn't seem worth reading. I prefered asmiov's foundation saga.
I thinks it's just like what's your favorite food. if you don't like it, you don't like it. By me listing the appeals of my soup, you will not find it tastes different or better.
I know that for the life of me I will never be able to read lord of the rings, not for lack of trying. Fantasy stuff really switches me right off, and the idea of a whole middleearth-hobbits-and-wizards fantasy saga appeals less than a week's school detention spent doing homework. For me, much like dune for you, I am totally, listlessly bored with it. Magic? I can no longer use my brain to understand the world presented to me? Uh� WTF |
|
Back to top |
|
Drunken Monkey member
Member # Joined: 08 Feb 2000 Posts: 1016 Location: mothership
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:22 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
Mind crushingly boring sci-fi. Even the SCI-FI channel remake was boring. Like watching some slow French saga about 17th century noblemen complete with wigs, pantyhose and royal house intrigues. shoot me now.
Spielberg bought right to make Altered Carbon. Wich i hope gets made... I don't know if that kind of thing is for everyone, but it feels somewhat like 5th element minus the exagerrated humor. Just really cool adventure, lots of cool concepts. You guys should check it out. _________________ "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity" - Sigmund Freud |
|
Back to top |
|
Lunatique member
Member # Joined: 27 Jan 2001 Posts: 3303 Location: Lincoln, California
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 6:39 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
Yeah, I can't read LOTR either. I finished the first book, and I couldn't get past the second one, as none of the stuff in the book felt like they mattered--I had no personal stakes in their outcome, and everything was just so contrived and sometimes bordering ridiculous. Funny thing is, I grew up reading fantasy and sci-fi novels. I never got to LOTR until I was 30, and by then, I had already been exposed to too many excellent fantasy novels that are lightyears beyond the sophistication and depth of LOTR. It's exactly the same when I go back and watch films made many decades ago--most of them were just so primitive in their execution, as the artform of filmmaking was still immature then. Today's films are a lot more complex in every way, as the artform has evolved so much.
Drunken Monkey - You summed it up better than I did. It's like, WHY should we give a shit about a bunch of nobles that we can't empathize with? Does it really matter who gives birth to the heir to the throne? The little fucker will grow up into another noble we don't give a shit about anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
[Shizo] member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 3938
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:40 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
I don't usually read books, but i want to suggest some that were written recently by a Russian author. His name is Boris Akunin, and he used to be a historian and specialist of Asian countries, but recently started writing adventure books about a russian detective in late 19th century. It's really f*cking great because he writes in old russian style, so at first i thought it was really written over a hundred years ago.
Unfortunately though, his books were only translated to French, Italian and Japanese.. Russian books are available online for free. But remember if you ever see a book by Boris Akunin you gotta grab it! |
|
Back to top |
|
DJorgensen member
Member # Joined: 26 Jun 2003 Posts: 147 Location: Edmonton, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:32 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
LOTR and Dune are my favorites of all sci-fi/fantasy literature.
Yes, Dune had a lot of politics. But you must accept that politics is a fact of life, and for Frank Herbert to not go into detail about it would have made the story rather strange. The series was written amazingly well - it contains some rather interesting philosophies in an effort to refect what a possible future would be for man.
Same goes for LOTR. The Silmarillion - virtually a textbook on the history of the Middle Earth is not something that most people would likely want to know. And yet for those that are interested in knowing everything they can, it is very wonderful. Tolkien created a world based upon who he was and what he had experienced. The Middle Earth was a very complete world - Tolkien covered aspects that most people would not have given any second thought.
Neither of these two individuals were high action, high excitement writers. They are epical authors instead. To that end, their stories would be hard to compare to the market that is currently out reading books and watching movies. We are now more of a society that craves for the moments of action and tires of politics and detail.
Regardless, for those that read the novels and contemplate why the author included the details and what the consequences would be if one of the details were changed, the experience of reading these novels is quite different. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
Lunatique member
Member # Joined: 27 Jan 2001 Posts: 3303 Location: Lincoln, California
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:46 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
DJorgensen wrote: |
Regardless, for those that read the novels and contemplate why the author included the details and what the consequences would be if one of the details were changed, the experience of reading these novels is quite different. |
I've got nothing against detail, but all the detail in the world can't make a compelling reading unless you engage the heart and soul of your reader. I've read other epic sagas before, and they all contain tons of detail about the world and the characters, but the best written ones gets you to care about the characters--you are right there next to them as they go through their epic journey, and you cry, laugh, love, hate, and grow with them, instead of being an indifferent bystander. |
|
Back to top |
|
Jimmyjimjim member
Member # Joined: 12 Dec 2002 Posts: 459
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 9:46 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
Dune is a fascinating examination of the manipulation of religion by politics. I read all four of the books before going into the "House" series (which . Anyone looking for mature science fiction that doesn't mind a little obvious social commentary would enjoy them.
As far as the books vs. the movies, I always thought that they were pretty much unfilmable, as the books weave a tightly-knit plot around it's many characters. Dune is a book where even the smallest character is capable of a pivotal moment. Dune: Messiah is arguably the best in the series, IMHO.
::This nerd moment brought to you by Jimmyjimjim:: |
|
Back to top |
|
Ragnarok member
Member # Joined: 12 Nov 2000 Posts: 1085 Location: Navarra, Spain
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2005 11:33 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
I read the first book and watched the David Lynch movie, but I couldn't stand the sequels of the first book, don't know why.
From my point of view, Dune is a book about a planet. The main character is Dune itself, with its extreme ecology and the quest to make it something where humans can live. I always thought Muab'dib was just the bringer of change, because with him the domination of the empire ends and begins a new era where fremen will make Dune a place to live, instead of a big factory. _________________ "Ever forward, my darling wind." -Master Yuppa
Seigetsu |
|
Back to top |
|
Impaler member
Member # Joined: 02 Dec 1999 Posts: 1560 Location: Albuquerque.NewMexico.USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:56 am |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
The greatest accomplishment of the LOTR movies was that they were actually able to wring some emotion out of those textbooks.
But then, some people like textbooks. Some people prefer to watch the History Channel when there's a perfectly good British drama on PBS. There's nothing really wrong with either group; some people are fascinated by the human existence, while others are charmed to death by the mechanism of a scenario.
To that end, Dune weaves a beautifully engineered tale of intrigue and politics. That's it, but that's enough for a lot of people.
Quote: |
It's exactly the same when I go back and watch films made many decades ago--most of them were just so primitive in their execution, as the artform of filmmaking was still immature then. Today's films are a lot more complex in every way, as the artform has evolved so much. |
I would strongly disagree, Lunatique. Where was the Ikiru of the 1990's? 400 Blows? Wild Strawberries? Seven Samurai? The Godfather? Sure, movies these days have (arguably) trickier camera shots, better color, better actors, computer effects. The fundamental cinema, however, hasn't gotten any more complex or challenging since the 1930's. Look at the Wizard of OZ. (or Laurence of Arabia, or Gone in the Wind) It's a masterpiece in every right, and it's 66 years old. The same still holds surprisingly true for animation. I'm still moved by the animation of Bambi, no matter how many lavishly animated modern anime I see.
But this is an issue for a separate thread, maybe? ![Very Happy](images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) _________________ QED, sort of. |
|
Back to top |
|
Icannon member
Member # Joined: 13 Sep 2000 Posts: 597 Location: st.albert, AB, Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 1:27 am |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
I couldnt agree more regarding the state and art of movies, Impaler. There were voids in the concept and execution of older movies just as there are voids in the concept and execution of newer movies.. but these voids were\are of a completely different nature. But you are right, this probably belongs in a different thread.
As far as dune is concerned, the movies\mini-series are probably a pretty large contributing factor to the reason one might not enjoy the book. And on the contrary, considering the original dune movie is a cult classic, it is probably the reason some people would love the book. So I think it has much to do with how you're introduced to something. Stories and books are very personal to a lot of people, so I think the books or even the movies of lord of the rings and dune are tough sells by nature. |
|
Back to top |
|
Lunatique member
Member # Joined: 27 Jan 2001 Posts: 3303 Location: Lincoln, California
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:09 am |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
Impaler wrote: |
But this is an issue for a separate thread, maybe? ![Very Happy](images/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif) |
Nah, Random Musings is so informal anyway, might as well shoot the breeze in here.
I agree about the LOTR movies--they pretty much shed the boring/ridiculous aspects of the books and only kept the stuff that was worth showing. But then again, this could be subjective, as some people were upset that Jackson took out all those silly Hobbit songs and the kiddy elements they treasured as children.
It's true that for some things, a documentary is better than a dramatized version, however, I don't see how a completely fictional history can be that intriguing to read when it has no bearing to our collective existence as a species. I tend to feel that if I'm expected to read hundreds and thousands of pages of made-up history (or watch many hours of it), you better engage my emotional involvement, or else I'd rather go read a REAL history book on WWII or something, because that's at least informative and educational.
For that same reason, I really don't like it when fantasy/sci-fi authors begin a book with a long prologue about the world that the story takes place in, basically giving me a history lesson about a world and a place I've yet to have a reason to give a shit about. I think writers have to EARN the immersion of the reader by engaging their emotions and intellect (always both, never just one). If you expect a reader to sit there and swallow that history lesson, then it's almost like breaking that simple rule of "Show, don't tell." Why not show me the world the story takes place in by letting me see it through the charcters' eyes? Isn't that a much better approach than writing a history lesson? From the descriptions I've gotten, it seems the entire Dune series is nothing but a fictional history lesson, devoid of characters we can care about or identify with.
I think it's really a matter of storytelling style. For example, you take the same event and let two different writers write it into a book, one could be nothing but facts and neutral telling of the events, and the other could be haunting, vivid, emotional, and profound. It's about the personality of the writer I think, and what's important to them as writers.
And about the classic films--yes, we had lots of gems. I'd be stupid and ignorant to argue with that. Sunrise (1927) and Casablanca (1942) are two of my favorite films, and they are difinitely what I'd call oldies. What I'm talking about though, is the evolution of the cinematic artform in all aspects (camera work, screenwriting, directing, editing, acting..etc). Over the last 100 years or so, the bar of filmmaking in all departments have been raised time and time again. Sure, we don't have modern equivalents of those classics you mentioned, but if we turn the table around, back then they sure didn't have films like The Sweet Hereafter, Goodfellas, American Beauty, Un Coer En Hiver..etc, where the filmmakers really dig deep into the psyche of characters in a way that had a kind of finess that older films don't have. Filmmakers today know more storytelling techniques, and they have a lot more references to great examples of masterful filmmaking to learn from. And if we get into the kind of films that couldn't have been made in the old days due to social climate or technology (Pulp Fiction, Bladerunner, Contact, Irreversible, American History X..etc), then I'd conclude that filmmaking was a lot more restrictive then. Today, we have so much more at our disposal, and I really don't believe people are less talented today than decades ago. We are a lot more commercialized that's for sure, but I think if we send some of the best modern films back in a time machine, they'd cause quite a sensation and become revered masterpieces too.
You know how in the history of art, the 19th century is commonly agreed on as the highest point? I'm wondering if there is such a time period for film--whether is has already happend or yet to come. 19th century art is seen as the height because science, philosophy, religion, politics..etc all came together in a way that gave the artists of that time the kind of environment inductive to superior works. It was a magical time that we might never see again. Since cinema is so young in comparison, we might not be able to look at the whole art form subjectively until another hundred years have passed. I think we are probably still too close to the films made in the last 20~30 years to judge them fairly. |
|
Back to top |
|
Gort member
Member # Joined: 09 Oct 2001 Posts: 1545 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:28 am |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
Quote: |
I had already been exposed to too many excellent fantasy novels that are lightyears beyond the sophistication and depth of LOTR. |
GASP!! Rob . . . oh my . . . you must try to read again but this time carefully. There is so much there. _________________ - Tom Carter
"You can't stop the waves but you can learn to surf" - Jack Kornfield |
|
Back to top |
|
watmough member
Member # Joined: 22 Sep 2003 Posts: 779 Location: Rockland, ME
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 5:08 am |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
ya,im with Gort on this one......wow. |
|
Back to top |
|
Gort member
Member # Joined: 09 Oct 2001 Posts: 1545 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 1:31 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
Rob, I'm still reeling . . .
I cannot imagine anything being beyond the complexity and sophistication of Tolkien's work. The appendixes are enormous - geography, socio-economics, languages - and that's just for LOTR. The same can be said for the Silmarillian, Unfinished Tales and others. _________________ - Tom Carter
"You can't stop the waves but you can learn to surf" - Jack Kornfield |
|
Back to top |
|
Jimmyjimjim member
Member # Joined: 12 Dec 2002 Posts: 459
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:33 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
Gort wrote: |
The same can be said for the Silmarillian, Unfinished Tales and others. |
Good point on the that, Gort. Gotta disagree with ya' on Silmarillon and Unfinished Tales, tho. I always saw those as backround filler, kinda like a history book. Not really complex and sophisticated storytelling, IMHO. Can't beat Hobbit and Rings, tho.
For anyone that finds LOTR tedious to read, try the audiobooks. I listen to it every year or so. It's a little easier to absorb in the backround while doing some artwork. |
|
Back to top |
|
shft5 junior member
Member # Joined: 27 Dec 2004 Posts: 15 Location: Ontario
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2005 10:03 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
I only enjoyed the original Dune(the book and movie). It involved fantasy, politics, and violence in one. The rest of them I won't bother reading because I don't believe I'll enjoy them as much. |
|
Back to top |
|
Nilwort member
Member # Joined: 26 Jan 2002 Posts: 319
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 5:12 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
I think that Dune is a story that is less about making you love the characters in an emotional or mammalian way, but more about presenting a world that could have been or that could exist sometime in the future. The story itself seems to be more concerned with giving only the necessary information like political alliances, possession of territory, scientific issues, descriptions of the environment, and a sort of detached, but sufficient explanation of the different character's thoughts and feelings. I think this is probably why you feel that there is no "hook" that grabs you in the movies Lunatique.
I know it's a clich�, but the movies aren't as good as the books. It takes not a whole lot of effort to watch a movie, but I find that when reading a book, you are more challenged and engaged in a way that the story becomes a part of you and gets mixed with your memories and experiences. I'm not saying that this doesn't happen at all with movies, but the experience seems to be more intense with books for me personally.
I enjoyed the Dune books (and the movies to a lesser extent) because I felt that the story became a part of myself or enhanced something that was already there. Dune is one of my favorite books because it provides a basic description of characters and events and your imagination is left to flesh them out into a more realistic picture. Dune was great because it mixed religion, science, politics, and the mystery of the unknown in a complex and epic way. So I think with the movies, you get less of the mental challenge and there is less participation on the viewer's part than reading the books.
Like most things in life, it really just boils down to what kind of person you are and what sort of stuff you like. I've always been interested in science and logical left-brained things in addition to having artistic interests and I think this sort of combination agrees well with Dune. I don't think the story was intended to be something that you could take in during one sitting, but requires you to actively participate with it and create it for yourself as you go along in order to enjoy it. I think this is probably true for a lot of things. |
|
Back to top |
|
sweetums member
Member # Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 236
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 8:41 pm |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
Reading the Dune series is like chewing through a tree. It is long, hard, though provoking when you are lucky, and engaging/exciting at its best. I've read some of the books (like God Emperor) 2-3 times to try to make the best sense of the religious/political commentary and the sub plots of power, relationships, and values/passions.
It's like caviar. A somewhat acquired taste, that some take to, and some don't... _________________ Life is short. Expect nothing, enjoy everything.
That which does not kill you should make you wiser... |
|
Back to top |
|
notic member
Member # Joined: 09 Apr 2001 Posts: 441 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:34 am |
|
![](templates/drizz/images/hrline.gif) |
at what point is chewing through a tree exciting?
I haven't even played dune or read the books or seen the series/movies, got no clue what so ever what the story is about.
I tried to listen to the Lord of the rings audio book, but it got boring because i've seen the movies, didn't really like the narrator as well.. i would want to hear it in english though. audio books in swedish are usually lame from my experience. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2005 phpBB Group
|