|
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Topic : "How to read photographs?" |
EviLToYLeT member
Member # Joined: 09 Aug 2000 Posts: 1216 Location: CA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2002 11:12 am |
|
|
I've been struggling a bit with an essay that I have to write in literature...
basically, trying to figure out what ways there are to read photographs, and i guess what I need is your opinion on how you read photographs.
To provide you maybe a vantage point for starting --
I think of photographs as an expression of the photographer, that he wishes to show the world what he thinks and evoke specific emotions from his piece. However, because each individual is different, the emotions, words, and themes that he tries to convey may be specific to him only. That's why I suggest that we don't read into the background information -- who took it, why he took it, when he took it, because we would be learning about the photographer, not ourselves.
Photographs are supposed to evoke emotion within a person without any prior information. ... mmm and some other stuff that I hvae written down.
Anyone want to tackle this from an artistic standpoint, ora documentation of a point in time in history?
I'm hoping that not only pro photographers respond... _________________ AIM: EviLToYLeT |
|
Back to top |
|
Atherium member
Member # Joined: 22 Jul 2002 Posts: 130 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2002 11:37 am |
|
|
Hey evil, one of the best ways you can learn this skill is prely through exposure to the medium.
Go to your local library and check out Jeff Wall. You can thank me after |
|
Back to top |
|
Ian Jones member
Member # Joined: 01 Oct 2001 Posts: 1114 Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
|
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2002 5:15 pm |
|
|
I geuss you could define photographs into some different categories.
Like
Portraits
Action (recording a movement, emphasising movement by freezing it at a critical point in its action)
Documentary (documenting a series of events, or recording what you saw one day)
Historical (something you want to remember, something that needs to be 'frozen' in time because it will soon be gone without a trace and therefore needs photographing)
I dunno... just some ideas. |
|
Back to top |
|
EviLToYLeT member
Member # Joined: 09 Aug 2000 Posts: 1216 Location: CA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2002 9:38 pm |
|
|
thanks for the replies guys... any more opinions? *looks at lunatuque, beth, among others* _________________ AIM: EviLToYLeT |
|
Back to top |
|
Lunatique member
Member # Joined: 27 Jan 2001 Posts: 3303 Location: Lincoln, California
|
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2002 10:43 pm |
|
|
As most of you know, I take tons of photographs.
My thoughts:
I try to capture a moment that could be lost forever. A glance, a gesture, a mood..etc, sometimes only happens once and could never be repeated to the same effect. I do my best to bring forth a series of these and then capture them--freezing them in time.
I also sometimes try to project my ideal onto the subject. A girl might not be very attractive in her looks or aura--until I confine her with the frame of my lens, discarting what I find undesirable, and directing her to become what she could never be on her own. People always commented on how beautiful my models are, when in fact, many of them you wouldn't look at twice if you saw them on the street. I don't pile on makeup or use elaborate lighting. It's all in the body language and the eyes.
But of course, when you have a beautiful model who is not only photogenic, but also has a wonderful sense of how to project that ideal for the camera, you already won half the battle. |
|
Back to top |
|
Ragnarok member
Member # Joined: 12 Nov 2000 Posts: 1085 Location: Navarra, Spain
|
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2002 11:19 pm |
|
|
Lunatique wrote: |
I try to capture a moment that could be lost forever. A glance, a gesture, a mood..etc, sometimes only happens once and could never be repeated to the same effect. I do my best to bring forth a series of these and then capture them--freezing them in time. |
I second that. It depends of the photographer and what he wants. But some of the greatest photographs out there just portrait something that happened in a moment and then was lost. It's like that photograph of a couple kissing in the middle of the street in Paris. It is a beautiful photo because you are seeing two persons showing each other their love.
When you manage to capture something unique, you probably have a great photo. And I'm not talking about it being totally original, but a photo that portraits something like a glance, someone looking at the sky, or something that moves you in a personal way.
The best photo I've ever taken is of a man, with a hat looking down. What's special in that photo is his eyes, the way he looks at the floor.
I hope this rant helps _________________ "Ever forward, my darling wind." -Master Yuppa
Seigetsu |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2005 phpBB Group
|