| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Topic : "Opinions?" |
Jezuz
junior member
Member #
Joined: 01 Dec 2001
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2001 6:38 pm |
 |
 |
Note: NOT MY WORK!
I enjoy the great talent that all of you have, and have been here multiple times to check the great work. Yet i would like to get your opinions on the following pieces (since you disliked the others) as i said i did NOT create this, i just wanted criticism on how they look.
 Created by Panya
 Created by Panya
 Created by Di@blo
 Created by KLRdesigns
 Created by Denton
these are my favorite pieces on the other forum, and wanted to know if any are up to "your standards" ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
[Shizo]
member
Member #
Joined: 22 Oct 1999
Posts: 3938
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2001 7:35 pm |
|
|
second pic i like, rest is poop
reason being:
second pic - actual work involved in creating ORIGINAL models and textures, and composition
rest of pics - MeshSmooth'ed models from cs wount cut it, even if you render it with GI
PS: actually.. that might not even be original stuff in second pic, so that makes thise whole pack of pictures a bunch of poop.
ps2: this isnt the best CS art.. there are some good looking ones that actually involve art
[ December 01, 2001: Message edited by: [Shizo] ] |
|
| Back to top |
|
Cicinimo
member
Member #
Joined: 03 Mar 2001
Posts: 705
Location: Seattle
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2001 7:40 pm |
|
|
73h 53KoNd 1 iz l337, 4nD 73h l457 1 iz m3di0cr3, 73h r357 suXor. d00d.
C1c1nimO |
|
| Back to top |
|
RoadMaster
member
Member #
Joined: 19 Nov 2000
Posts: 163
Location: Ontario
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2001 7:46 pm |
|
|
the sad part is the fact that I understand what you just said  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Vesuvius
member
Member #
Joined: 13 Jan 2001
Posts: 718
Location: Newton, Ma, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2001 8:22 pm |
|
|
| I thought the sad part was that flat has now recruited 2 CS forums people to come here and post cs art... |
|
| Back to top |
|
GPoodle
member
Member #
Joined: 03 Oct 2001
Posts: 80
Location: Wis
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2001 1:27 am |
|
|
The pictures are really all quite bad.
The bullets in the third picture (first two dont load) are horrible and try chamfering some of the edges. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Isric
member
Member #
Joined: 23 Jul 2000
Posts: 1200
Location: Calgary AB
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2001 1:35 am |
|
|
| Yay! More junior high counter-strike art! Just what we need around here! WOO!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
AliasMoze
member
Member #
Joined: 24 Apr 2000
Posts: 814
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2001 3:49 am |
|
|
The first pic is an interesting concept, though a hackneyed one. The rendering looks like a video game, which is not such a good concept. Video games look bad, because they have to. When doing fan art, why not make the art what the designers and players imagine: real people in real environments, not low-poly models.
I have no opinion on the second. The third seems pointless and -again- rendered like a game. Maybe in thirty years it'll be cooly retro.
The fourth seems like a box cover or something. Aside from the art, the writing is hackish. "Broken Story"? "Spiteful Mist"? "Horison of fate" (which is spelled incorrectly)? If you're trying to make a dramatic point, then put some drama into it, not bad rips of old cliches.
The last one? No real opinion, unless you were designing these for a game or something, in which case they look ok.
Of course, I'm no fan of fan art, except those movies people make right from the Quake engine. Those are funny. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
