data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fda48/fda482a65c6e1449bc78d2553cb3a45c17c54c1d" alt="" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96f69/96f69e1c3c7676e0f00cf6f298b59e32d47adeb9" alt="This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies." |
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Topic : "Could someone check the anatomy... (nudity)" |
strata member
Member # Joined: 23 Jan 2001 Posts: 665 Location: stockholm, sweden
|
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2002 2:03 am |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9598e/9598e878877e05745ac68c28c8bed8c9251860f6" alt="" |
of this? I did it using Loomis' mannkein frame thingamejig, thus completely without reference, but I'm not sure it's entirely correct... there's two things that I noticed that are probably wrong, those being the right (her left) breast which looks like it's seen from a different angle, and the fact that one hand should grasp the arm...
Anything else anyone notices?
thanks a lot!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/559a0/559a0b75d15923f8f55c934a0860725d4d6298d3" alt="" |
|
Back to top |
|
Pixie Nim junior member
Member # Joined: 28 Mar 2002 Posts: 25 Location: ganjaland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2002 4:28 am |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9598e/9598e878877e05745ac68c28c8bed8c9251860f6" alt="" |
okay, anatomically... I think her waist is *slightly* too wide... although her hips and shoulders are just right (and most people get them too thin). Her breasts look fine to me (and I should know, I have a pair of my own for reference purposes!!) - but if you still feel they are a little off, I'd move the left one over to the right, but only a bit. They look *much* better than a lot of efforts I've seen - realistic! not fake silicone type breasts, but actual flesh ones, to the extent that you can see their weight in the picture, which I think is great.
Otherwise, I'd adjust her jawline (I think it's a little too long) and maybe work on the face, which looks a little plain and uninteresting - not much expression, a bit stern. Her eyes *might* be a little high on her face, but that's probably just me, so ignore that one. And the hair's a bit... same thing, really, a bit uninteresting and flat.
To have done this without any reference is quite impressive - it's obvious your observation skills are pretty tight!
That good enough for ya?
Pixie
[ April 26, 2002: Message edited by: Pixie Nim ]
[ April 26, 2002: Message edited by: Pixie Nim ] |
|
Back to top |
|
strata member
Member # Joined: 23 Jan 2001 Posts: 665 Location: stockholm, sweden
|
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2002 4:57 am |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9598e/9598e878877e05745ac68c28c8bed8c9251860f6" alt="" |
Thanks a lot pixie!! =)
As for things being plain and uninteresting, this is just the sketch, I'm planning on painting it into a real picture, but I wanted to get things right before I went down that route since it's harder to change further on...
I'm glad the breasts seem natural to you, that's one of the things that I was worried about when I did them... I'm still a bit bothered by (our) the right one though...
Oh, and I'll bring in the waist, good point!
Thanks a lot for the comments!
[ April 26, 2002: Message edited by: strata ] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2005 phpBB Group
|