| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Topic : "[crit] [pencil] barely naked chick - lingerie advertising" |
Mime
member
Member #
Joined: 02 Oct 2000
Posts: 224
Location: France
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2000 11:41 am |
 |
 |
It's a pic i did today mainly to train my shading technique with graphite. I did draw it from an advertising in a magazine. I'm pretty happy with I noticed that the legs are a little too short ... well i wont retouch it i think since I did it as a shading exercice.
crits and opinion are of course welcome 
[This message has been edited by Mime (edited December 01, 2000).] |
|
| Back to top |
|
Zaph0d
member
Member #
Joined: 31 Aug 2000
Posts: 66
Location: Toronto,On, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2000 2:00 pm |
|
|
| It has alot of depth, lo0ks good |
|
| Back to top |
|
EviLToYLeT
member
Member #
Joined: 09 Aug 2000
Posts: 1216
Location: CA, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2000 3:44 pm |
|
|
| Yah I agree.it does have a lot of depth..looks good Cept one thing that strikes me odd is the clavicle.. upper shoulder on the left... seems to drop into her breast? what's up with that? But anyway, very interesting texture you got going there.... hehe |
|
| Back to top |
|
dr . bang
member
Member #
Joined: 07 Apr 2000
Posts: 1245
Location: Den Haag, Holland
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2000 4:23 pm |
|
|
| E R R E C T I O N ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
toast!
member
Member #
Joined: 29 Sep 2000
Posts: 442
Location: France
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2000 4:49 pm |
|
|
hahaha Aubade dans le catalogue des 3 suisses ou le tele 7 jours je parie
btw, nice rendering |
|
| Back to top |
|
Ampa
member
Member #
Joined: 09 Nov 2000
Posts: 110
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2000 6:00 pm |
|
|
Looks good to me. One thing the foot is a little odd. Very difficult angle to capture, but it seems too short / squashed / flat... I dunno - but i get the feeling it would distort her buttock more as well where the heal pushes it to the flesh.
Ampa. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Mime
member
Member #
Joined: 02 Oct 2000
Posts: 224
Location: France
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2000 8:37 pm |
|
|
thanxs for the replies
hehe dr bang, that means she is well drawn i suppose
eviltoylet im not really sure to understand, difficult terms for me
h�h� toast, ouaip c'est aubade lecon 32 mais en fait c'etait un gars de notre clase qui faisait un commentaire d'image et je l'ai dessin� pendant son expos�
yes Ampa, im not really happy with the right leg, but i cant really retouch it on paper, i will maybe retouch it with pshop, but i dont know how to keep the paper grain ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Transcendence
member
Member #
Joined: 11 Jun 2000
Posts: 242
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2000 1:54 pm |
|
|
| what stands out to me is the line of the top of her left thigh.....it seems to go too low |
|
| Back to top |
|
Snake Grunger
member
Member #
Joined: 24 Mar 2000
Posts: 584
Location: Montreal, Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2000 2:07 pm |
|
|
| Vachement sympa.. Mais tu as n�glig� son visage! Allez, dessine-le! C'est l� qu'on retrouve 50%+ de la beaut� d'une femme. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Mime
member
Member #
Joined: 02 Oct 2000
Posts: 224
Location: France
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2000 11:44 am |
|
|
H�h� snake yes i should try making one, but the reference advertising was whithout head , since it is for selling lingerie they thought the face of the woman wasnt important, only the beauty of the body, so any woman can this she is this woman (well that is how i understand the thinking behibnd this ad)
so maybe i will imagine a face if i have some time |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
