View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Topic : "Sophie Ellis-Bextor's lovely face" |
quaternion junior member
Member # Joined: 07 May 2008 Posts: 9
|
|
Back to top |
|
quaternion junior member
Member # Joined: 07 May 2008 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:54 am |
|
|
Hi there,
if I want to make a portrait of someone like Sophie Ellis-Bextor, is it "the wrong way to work" to put the ref pic beneath the painting and to help with the lines this way? Because I feel that this is a fun way to work, and it gets me relatively fast-paced results. I also feel it's more fun doing the shading, because that gives things shape. I don't know if I actually make progress technically working this way, but I think so. I guess it does teach one how to draw noses, lips, eyes etc.
What do you think? Is that a lazy way to work, or is it OK if I make technical studies from time to time (which I do, I use a book by Burne Hogarth)?
Q. |
|
Back to top |
|
ninmonkeys junior member
Member # Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:10 pm |
|
|
(I'm a newbie, here's my $0.02)
My first thought is the reference is compressed a lot, artifacts making it hard to learn from it.
It looks like you could use a larger, more opaque brush to place the values down. Then after that, you can use a smaller more transparent one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|