View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Topic : "pre plucked chicken" |
jr member
Member # Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 1046 Location: nyc
|
|
Back to top |
|
Sedone member
Member # Joined: 11 May 2000 Posts: 455 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue May 21, 2002 12:20 pm |
|
 |
Ahhh! That's just wrong. Deep fry that fella and I'd still eat it, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
Dr. Bang member
Member # Joined: 04 Dec 2001 Posts: 1425 Location: DENHAAG, HOLLAND
|
Posted: Tue May 21, 2002 12:27 pm |
|
 |
If it taste like chicken then i definitely will.
No more having to pluck out chicken feathers wheeeeeeeeeeeee. |
|
Back to top |
|
a_sh member
Member # Joined: 04 Oct 2001 Posts: 149 Location: Uppsala, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue May 21, 2002 1:45 pm |
|
 |
Cool, now if they only could invent a meatball tree
but seriously, that's one ugly chicken! |
|
Back to top |
|
klaivu member
Member # Joined: 29 Jan 2000 Posts: 551 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Tue May 21, 2002 2:20 pm |
|
 |
Handy. |
|
Back to top |
|
Satan member
Member # Joined: 21 Nov 2001 Posts: 100 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue May 21, 2002 5:16 pm |
|
 |
I want one in green  |
|
Back to top |
|
Cooter member
Member # Joined: 28 Nov 2000 Posts: 101 Location: Seattle, WA USofA
|
Posted: Tue May 21, 2002 7:27 pm |
|
 |
mmmmmmmm....
DADDY'S HUNGRY!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
kana member
Member # Joined: 02 May 2002 Posts: 165 Location: finland
|
Posted: Wed May 22, 2002 9:08 am |
|
 |
"The bottom line is profit, but it should be animal welfare"
i hate this attitude. and not just in this instance, but on the whole. for me, HUMAN welfare is primary.
i'm not saying featherless chickens are in humans' best interest, but animal rights activists just forget humans sometimes. i mean if you need a cause, make it third world countries or refugees or the earth in general, like the rainforests for chrissakes, not some minks or chickens.
=|
8(
( this isn't a personal attack on anyone in this thread BTW )
[ May 22, 2002: Message edited by: kana ] |
|
Back to top |
|
[Shizo] member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 3938
|
Posted: Wed May 22, 2002 10:16 am |
|
 |
Hehe well, they are all getting eaten by peoples at the end, so how does it matter if they walk around without feathers for a few months and then get butchered? |
|
Back to top |
|
Awetopsy member
Member # Joined: 04 Oct 2000 Posts: 3028 Location: Kelowna
|
Posted: Wed May 22, 2002 1:39 pm |
|
 |
there ya go Satan  |
|
Back to top |
|
Lukiaz member
Member # Joined: 02 Aug 2001 Posts: 242 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed May 22, 2002 2:09 pm |
|
 |
"The bottom line is profit, but it should be animal welfare"
i hate this attitude. and not just in this instance, but on the whole. for me, HUMAN welfare is primary.
i'm not saying featherless chickens are in humans' best interest, but animal rights activists just forget humans sometimes. i mean if you need a cause, make it third world countries or refugees or the earth in general, like the rainforests for chrissakes, not some minks or chickens.
True true, cause these are just stupid animals, nothing more.
Kinda like alot of humans.
Fucked up. Ignorance of the highest degree. |
|
Back to top |
|
[Shizo] member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 3938
|
Posted: Wed May 22, 2002 3:55 pm |
|
 |
Ye it kinda sucks that people are the only animals who do poop to other animals of the planet (ie growing chickens to eat them)
Dumping toxic waste on animals, cause humans are animals too in case nobody noticed.
Which basically means, humans = desease
[ May 22, 2002: Message edited by: [Shizo] ] |
|
Back to top |
|
Coaster member
Member # Joined: 19 Feb 2002 Posts: 508 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed May 22, 2002 4:50 pm |
|
 |
so what makes people think their above animals? If anything they are FAR below...
...now all they need to do is make pre breaded/cooked chicken...
 |
|
Back to top |
|
Lukiaz member
Member # Joined: 02 Aug 2001 Posts: 242 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed May 22, 2002 4:59 pm |
|
 |
With todays technology I think it would be relatively easy for them to grow a chicken breast without the need for the useless bits like the head or legs.
The only problem would be mass producing it and getting it passed those bleeding heart hippies who always get in the fucking way. |
|
Back to top |
|
Hunago member
Member # Joined: 27 Jan 2002 Posts: 154 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed May 22, 2002 9:50 pm |
|
 |
That chicken's head looks yummy,
where did the heads usually go though, do they grind it up and feed to other chickens? |
|
Back to top |
|
kana member
Member # Joined: 02 May 2002 Posts: 165 Location: finland
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2002 3:27 am |
|
 |
i'm not saying it's right for us to benefit from the suffering of animals. it's just that i've grown somewhat intolerant of animal rights activists because a girlfriend of mine of 2 years was one of the highest degree. she could be called an animal rights fascist.
yes, i think it's wrong to create a new species of chicken that isn't even a chicken anymore, just because farmers could save a buck.
[ May 23, 2002: Message edited by: kana ] |
|
Back to top |
|
edraket member
Member # Joined: 18 Sep 2001 Posts: 505 Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2002 4:23 am |
|
 |
The thing that bothers me most is that with these things it's always supposedly invented to aid the poor people in the 3rd world.
I mean.. that is just such hypocracy. We all know this chicken was designed to shorten the production process...money.
Just like some starving family in africa is going to have money to buy a state of the art chicken engineered exactly to fit their needs.
People are not kept in a cage that is so small that they can't move. They aren't fed horomones so they grow faster. They aren't force fed to make their livers burts or boiled alive just because it makes them tastier.
They cannot defend themselves. And thats why some people make it their cause to help them.
When someone spends his energy on helping some other creature I don't see whats wrong with that. If you feel that people are more important than help people. But do it yourself and don't just sit there and nag at other people like you have the right to decide what they should devote their time and energy on.
This particular instance doesn't even bother me that much. It just showed that animals have become a product and not seen as living beings anymore. Well we already knew that.
It's not like a regular bio-industry chicken looks much better. |
|
Back to top |
|
DickCheese junior member
Member # Joined: 23 May 2002 Posts: 32 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2002 7:51 am |
|
 |
yum! Skinless chicken rules! |
|
Back to top |
|
[666]Flat member
Member # Joined: 18 Mar 2001 Posts: 1545 Location: FRANKFURT, Germany
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2002 1:50 pm |
|
 |
quote: Originally posted by Sedone:
Ahhh! That's just wrong. Deep fry that fella and I'd still eat it, though.
you seen da photos of brotha Lunatique yet?
nuff said. |
|
Back to top |
|
[Shizo] member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 3938
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2002 4:13 pm |
|
 |
In near future kids will be produced in a similar fascion - engineered to be more perfect, no defects, more able to do tasks like some for farming, some for architecture. Soon there will be crimes such as "growing a group of trained humans for your own purpose such as taking over the world" you'll see :D |
|
Back to top |
|
Pat member
Member # Joined: 06 Feb 2001 Posts: 947 Location: San Antonio
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2002 11:34 pm |
|
 |
Feh. Chicken technology won't impress me until they're actually growing the critters with Popeye's cajun spices INSIDE the little guys.
-Pat |
|
Back to top |
|
Satan member
Member # Joined: 21 Nov 2001 Posts: 100 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon May 27, 2002 10:23 am |
|
 |
 |
|
Back to top |
|
Aura member
Member # Joined: 25 Oct 2001 Posts: 55 Location: Yuma, AZ
|
Posted: Thu May 30, 2002 10:18 am |
|
 |
EEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!!!!but hey its chicken... |
|
Back to top |
|
|