| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Topic : "minimalism" |
clastic
junior member
Member #
Joined: 18 Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Location: kansas city
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Godwin
member
Member #
Joined: 24 Apr 2002
Posts: 701
Location: Singapore
|
|
| Back to top |
|
broken pixel
junior member
Member #
Joined: 03 Oct 2001
Posts: 7
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:59 pm |
 |
 |
| wtf. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Petri.J
member
Member #
Joined: 04 Dec 2003
Posts: 437
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 1:24 pm |
|
|
As you can see from those two profound comments before me, this picture doesn't seem to have any idea, no place for eye to stop, or any feeling. If you want to make a cool picture with no subject, you should try to direct the eye to look some certain spot. But that doesn't mean that you should leave the surroundings less interesting. I think the best solution would be that if the eye, as soon as it sees the picture, concentrates at some spot and then moves throung the whole painting to some other spot, and stays there.
This is easier to say than do, but good luck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Naeem
member
Member #
Joined: 13 Oct 2004
Posts: 1222
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 5:23 pm |
|
|
Last edited by Naeem on Mon Mar 21, 2005 12:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
winjer
junior member
Member #
Joined: 28 Mar 2002
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 6:20 pm |
|
|
why didnt you post this instead. this is actually cool to look at |
|
| Back to top |
|
DeadbeaT
member
Member #
Joined: 18 May 2003
Posts: 97
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:48 am |
|
|
i hate it when people do like this..
_________________
DeadbeaT was here |
|
| Back to top |
|
clastic
junior member
Member #
Joined: 18 Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Location: kansas city
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:06 pm |
|
|
Thanks for the criticism. I think that will be helpful in the future.... I wasn't thinking about flow. Thanks for taking the time to look at some of the other stuff also. I posted the first one because it was much more recent. That's all. I have another similar to the first that I'll post now.
_________________
http://www.clastic.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
clastic
junior member
Member #
Joined: 18 Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Location: kansas city
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:18 pm |
|
|
color variation ...check
movement and flow ... check
_________________
http://www.clastic.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
Francis
member
Member #
Joined: 18 Mar 2000
Posts: 1155
Location: San Diego, CA
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 5:58 pm |
|
|
this last one is really nice. It does tell more of a "story" somehow. The first one was static, and the blur on everything made it seem like it was out of focus, instead of intentional.
_________________
Francis Tsai
TeamGT Studios |
|
| Back to top |
|
Heysoos
member
Member #
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 294
Location: the New Mexico
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2005 9:58 pm |
|
|
yeah, that one is very nice. it strikes me as being much more in the theme of minimalism than the others.
_________________
http://www.angelfire.com/art2/wfkeil |
|
| Back to top |
|
starglider2
member
Member #
Joined: 19 Mar 2002
Posts: 275
Location: belgium
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:33 am |
|
|
??
??
??
not enough frequency difference
_________________
If there is no God, who pops up the next kleenex in the box? |
|
| Back to top |
|
winjer
junior member
Member #
Joined: 28 Mar 2002
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2005 4:15 pm |
|
|
| why dont you look up some info about push pull color theory and how you can use that to create depth with just color. as it is in the last one your bright blue red and yellow dots are popping way forward in space. you could make it more rythmic if you controlled the relative depths better |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
