[EPigeon]

Photo study of Jessica Simpson:




Reference: http://www.sweetkisses.net/images/blenderhq/images/05.jpg

I think it turned out pretty well. She doesn't look wet at all, but oh well.
_________________
-Pigeon

[Deckard]

Amazing, that is as close you can get to a photo I would say, great stuff.
_________________
"It would be quicker to train an APE!"
-- Basil Fawlty

[neff]

[faeklone]

awesome pic. I think the reason why her hair doesn't look wet is due to the fact that in the original pic the hair looks like it's tracing the contours of her face. However, in yours they seem to be floating above her face, which you don't necessarily assosciate with wet hair. That's just the strands going across her face. The hair on the right hand side, I think is what is working as wet.

Anyway, good study.

[Tinusch]

Looks great, but I think it would look more wet if you made those highlights on her face a little harder and brighter.

[CwStone]

[xheadinthecloudx]

actually, i think the hair looks pretty good.... I think the main problem is that the eyes and lips are a little too sharply defined.
_________________
They don't know who they're f***ing with... they're f***ing with a lean, mean, tattooed, rated-g boy scout.
-Henry Rollins

[math]

and the nose is wrong...in the photo her nose is like some quarterpipe (yeah exxagerated i know ) at the tip. not in your drawing or its just the shadows which make seem it to me like..no-pipe
_________________
quit pro quo