| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Topic : "Tina Portrait in Painter 7" |
Lunatique
member
Member #
Joined: 27 Jan 2001
Posts: 3303
Location: Lincoln, California
|
 Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 7:50 am |
 |
 |
Felt like doing a portrait this evening, so I booted up Painter 7 and did this one of Tina. Took about 6 hours.
Oops. Tina just pointed out that 6 hours is incorrect, since we had dinner, snuggled for a bit, and then I played through 2 levels of Medal Of Honor. That makes it about 4 hours.
[ May 03, 2002: Message edited by: Lunatique ] |
|
| Back to top |
|
hamilton
member
Member #
Joined: 10 Jun 2001
Posts: 143
Location: minnesota
|
| Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 9:15 am |
|
|
| so... this was done live? kudos. looks really fantastic. the subtle backlighting on the skin really works well. s'at from a tv? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Lunatique
member
Member #
Joined: 27 Jan 2001
Posts: 3303
Location: Lincoln, California
|
| Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 9:29 am |
|
|
| Nope. I wouldn't have a live session when I'm painting on the computer--I only do that for traditional paintings. It was from a pic I took. |
|
| Back to top |
|
saripol
member
Member #
Joined: 17 Nov 2000
Posts: 191
Location: Selangor, Malaysia
|
| Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 9:40 am |
|
|
this is just amazing luna...
I can't stand the slow brush with painter 7 when working big.. I just have to ask how big is the working res on this one? thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
the_monkey
member
Member #
Joined: 20 May 2000
Posts: 688
Location: BC, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 9:47 am |
|
|
looks great!!
i thought it was a photo at first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Lunatique
member
Member #
Joined: 27 Jan 2001
Posts: 3303
Location: Lincoln, California
|
| Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 10:32 am |
|
|
| saripol-- It was only 963 x 1069. Not big at all. I didn't see the point in working large for this one. In fact, it was only supposed to be a quick brush work exercise, but turned into a pretty finished piece--which is NOT what I wanted. I wanted to do a quick Sargent-esque study, but ended up making it too polished. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Daijoobu
member
Member #
Joined: 05 Jan 2001
Posts: 132
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 2:10 pm |
|
|
| Fantastic! what brushes do you use? |
|
| Back to top |
|
SWANYDSPIN
member
Member #
Joined: 17 Feb 2002
Posts: 52
Location: I come from the land down under
|
| Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 8:12 pm |
|
|
Holy shit, I've never seen anything so beautiful, and it only took 6 hours, I cant comprehend, I need painter 7.
Tutorial please? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Lunatique
member
Member #
Joined: 27 Jan 2001
Posts: 3303
Location: Lincoln, California
|
| Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 8:14 pm |
|
|
I only used the palette knife, opaque flat, and opaque round.
I originally was going to post the script for the entire session, but I deleted the rif file.  I'll remember to save the rif file next time and post the steps.
It actually took 4 hours, since I goofed off for a while around dinner time. 
As far as tuts go, you can do a search for my Melancholic Princess thread in the WIP section. I had posted tons of inbetween steps for that painting. 
[ May 03, 2002: Message edited by: Lunatique ] |
|
| Back to top |
|
makotierra
junior member
Member #
Joined: 12 May 2001
Posts: 39
Location: California
|
| Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 8:37 pm |
|
|
| Very cool, indeed, and only four hours of work! I need me a version of Painter. The hair turned out great. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Malachi Maloney
member
Member #
Joined: 16 Oct 2001
Posts: 942
Location: Arizona
|
| Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 10:27 pm |
|
|
Very cool. Makes me want to go out and buy a copy of Painter for myself.
Very natural looking, great work dude.
~M~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
Sedone
member
Member #
Joined: 11 May 2000
Posts: 455
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Fri May 03, 2002 11:10 pm |
|
|
| Nice work, Lunatique. That hair kills me! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
