[Liser Studios]

I was talking with my one friend, and he insists that the new Zelda for the Gamecube and that Madden 2002's models are better and more detailed than Final Fantasy X's. Not on a personal preference level, but on a realism level.
So, does anyone know what the polygon counts for each of these games models are?

[[Shizo]]

No, and you wount find out unless someone who worked on both games tells you, or it says in the package or someplace.

[Andrew Crocker]

well, does he mean the new 'cell-da' look, the spaceworld 2000 Link, or the Link in SSB:M? The cell-da Link is cell shaded, so not much detail is needed, the spaceworld 2000 was very early, before the nintendo guys really knew what they were doing, but the SSB:M moidel looks great. i would say that he looks very good, and almost as good as the FFX people.

the madden ones are good as well. i would say that the FFx people look better, but that's just because it's an RPG, where the camera is up close and personal with the people all the time. while madden has to throw a lot pf people on the screen at once.

now, the people in the new resident evil game look great. better than the FFx.

oh, and, no, I don't know the polys in the meshes for the people.

[ December 31, 2001: Message edited by: Andrew Crocker ]

[Quasar]

I am very sure that Final Fantasy has the better graphics. The characters in final fantasy at full level of detail are around 10,000 polys and the madden models are probebly more like 5000 becuase the football game is going to have more chacters on the screen at any given time.

[JuRrAsStOiL]

loool "cell-da" I love this name. But I heard that nintendo will change it back to the "normal" look, because so many people wrote emails and stuff like that and said that the new "cell-da" look really suxx. So, nintendo decided to change it back... don't know if this is right, but it would be realistic
Personally I don't play any console games... stopped that at the age of 14